2011 Apr 18, 2:13pm
by

1 comment

Timelessness in Art

You can often overhear interesting things in art museums and galleries. On the last day of “The Wyeths: America’s Artists” at the Kalamazoo Institute of Arts, a man standing one painting to our left said with a semi-sour look, “The mullet kind of dates it”; he was looking at Jamie Wyeth’s “Portrait of Orca Bates”, and I think he mostly missed the point – but I’ll get to that.Portrait of Orca Bates, Jamie Wyeth, 1989, Oil on Panel, 50 x 40 in., Farnsworth Art Museum, Rockland, Maine

Timelessness is one of those art terms that, if you frequent artsy circles, you will regularly hear thrown around. You will most often hear it used in a context of either praise or derision; it’s one of those art terms. Andrew Wyeth is known to have said that he liked painting nudes because of the timeless quality of the picture; I think maybe depicting a nude in front of some sort of amorphous background is the only way a figurative painting might be considered timeless (in the sense of the art term, at least), and even then, hair styles may be a giveaway to the time period.

Because we only have the personal experience of our own time, I think it is much easier to see images from the past as having a timeless quality. What we’re really seeing is unfamiliarity, out-of-our-own-timeness, not timelessness. Old stuff – frilly clothing, long bygone hair styles, antique personal accouterments, horses, ragged wooden shacks – always has a way of seeming classical, timeless. Maybe in a few generations, a mullet, a gold stud earring, battered work boots, and a Hard Rock Cafe t-shirt will be classical too; we just can’t see it right now. Personally, I don’t really care, it’s a beautifully expressive painting.

Maybe the real questions are: Does it matter? Are we getting the point?

I don’t think timelessness really matters.

First, pure timelessness is very rare.

Second, our enjoyment and understanding of a painting shouldn’t be swayed by critical art-world terminology.

Third, art is better understood when taken in the context of the artist’s time period and personality, and the Wyeths are no exception to this. Andrew and Jamie are known for distilling the essence of their experiences, surroundings, and imaginations in their paintings. It is this very observation and recording of their intimate universe coupled with a willingness to externalize their hearts and minds that makes their art so great – so full of meaning and emotion. When we begin to engage with all the possible stories behind their images, when we begin to understand and have a feeling for the artist’s intent, they only become deeper.


Tags: , , ,

wow. A very interesting post! I had a great conversation with a friend at a gallery just the other day about “timelessness” and the dating paintings by costumes. The subject was a beautiful woman in a distinctively 80s ladies suit.. It was a huge canvas and a great painting. It was a “epiphany”-type moment. I, right there and then, decided I no longer cared about how subject matter and composition dates a painting. My lack of appreciation for her sense of fashion, at that time in her life, is really irrelevant to the painting. The painting is about her, not me. It’s her story and time marches on. If people had forever, they might be less inclined to spend so much time capturing moments. That would be timelessness. For now- we’re all dated. Art reflects that, and I’m ok with that(for now.)

*name

*e-mail

web site

leave a comment (all comments are held for approval)

*


 
  • Subscribe, Connect

  • Categories

  • “It's a moment that I'm after, a fleeting moment, but not a frozen moment.”
    ~ Andrew Wyeth

  • Recent Posts

  • “Joy in looking and comprehending is nature's most beautiful gift.”
    ~ Albert Einstein

  • “And who will care, who will chide you if you wander away
    from wherever you are, to look for your soul?”

    ~ Mary Oliver
    ~ from the poem, Have You Ever Tried to Enter the Long Black Branches